• HOME PAGE
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • YouTube
Current time: 06-17-2025, 04:16 AM Hello There, Guest! (Login — Register)
Wines.com

Translate

  • HOMEHOME
  •   
  • Recent PostsRecent Posts
  •   
  • Search
  •      
  • Archive Lists
  •   
  • Help

WineBoard / TASTING NOTES & WINE SPECIFIC FORUMS / Italian Wines/Varieties v
« Previous 1 … 24 25 26 27 28 … 49 Next »
/ Barolo 2000

Threaded Mode | Linear Mode
Barolo 2000
07-31-2004, 07:43 AM,
#1
enotecaejs Offline
Registered
Posts: 1
Threads: 1
Joined: Jul 2004
 
I just returned from a trip to the several towns in the barolo region with about 80 bottles of various barolos from the spectator recommended list that were available in the various shops throughout Alba, Barolo, Monforte, La Morra, Serralunga and Castiglione Falletto. Does anyone out there yet have any experience with these gems as I need to begin the sampling process?
Find
Reply
08-01-2004, 01:13 PM,
#2
wondersofwine Offline
Registered
Posts: 5,585
Threads: 1,179
Joined: May 2001
 
First, welcome to this wine forum. Hope we will hear from you regularly.

What vintage/vintages are they? I understand that Barolo should age for about 15 years before consumption. I have only tried a couple younger Barolos at a tasting so don't have the experience to judge them.
Me bad--I overlooked that your heading says 2000. Expect the wines to be quite tannic and not smoothly integrated at this stage.

Maybe Foodie or Roberto will weigh in as they are more familiar with Italian wines.


[This message has been edited by wondersofwine (edited 08-01-2004).]

[This message has been edited by wondersofwine (edited 08-01-2004).]
Find
Reply
08-10-2004, 02:34 PM,
#3
Botafogo Offline
Wine Whiz
***
Posts: 1,328
Threads: 145
Joined: Jan 1999
 
Mr. Suckling is completely off base in his assessment of the 2000 vintage which is even LESS classic and typical of great Barolo than the 1997 vintage. 1996 and 2001 are going to be the great vintages of recent times according to most growers with any integrity and almost all European critics and lovers of the Langhe.

Having said that, he liked the 2000 BECAUSE they were high in alcohol, fruit forward and not so tannic (in essence, more like Californian and Australian wines) and not structured like classic Barolo. This means you can drink them earlier (maybe 3-5 years from now would be a good time to start) but they will never have the incredible complexity of classic vintages.

This same thing happened with 89 vs 90 and 96 vs 97 with the earlier vintage being classic and the later of the pairs being very hot and overblown (and hyped by Suckling and Parker) and the comparison tastings being sone now really tell the tale.

Roberto

For a REALLY thorough discussion of this and more, check here:

http://fora.erobertparker.com/ubb/ultimatebb.php/topic/1/37181.html

[This message has been edited by Botafogo (edited 08-10-2004).]
Find
Reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  2000 Fontanafredda Barolo TheEngineer 0 5,225 09-13-2009, 07:59 PM
Last Post: TheEngineer
  2000 Azelia Barolo San Rocco TheEngineer 0 5,074 03-19-2006, 09:02 AM
Last Post: TheEngineer
  2000 Azelia Barolo TheEngineer 0 4,902 01-07-2006, 10:02 AM
Last Post: TheEngineer
  2000 La Loggia Barolo TheEngineer 0 6,797 11-25-2005, 09:44 PM
Last Post: TheEngineer
  2000 Rucas Barolo hotwine 2 7,775 08-25-2005, 06:15 PM
Last Post: hotwine
  2000 Villa Rossa Barolo hotwine 13 23,055 06-02-2005, 10:42 PM
Last Post: jmcginley1

  • View a Printable Version
  • Send this Thread to a Friend
  • Subscribe to this thread



© 1994-2025 Copyright Wines.com. All rights reserved.