• HOME PAGE
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • YouTube
Current time: 06-16-2025, 07:40 AM Hello There, Guest! (Login — Register)
Wines.com

Translate

  • HOMEHOME
  •   
  • Recent PostsRecent Posts
  •   
  • Search
  •      
  • Archive Lists
  •   
  • Help

WineBoard / TASTING NOTES & WINE SPECIFIC FORUMS / Cabernet Sauvignon v
« Previous 1 … 41 42 43 44 45 … 93 Next »
/ Two heavy hitters

Threaded Mode | Linear Mode
Two heavy hitters
03-16-2006, 09:42 PM,
#1
Bucko Offline
Banned
Posts: 4,800
Threads: 540
Joined: Jan 1999
 
2002 Altamura, Cabernet Sauvignon, Napa Valley, California, $65, 4,000 cases. This inky beast is an intense, extracted, jammy wine, delivering black fruit, new leather and cedary vanilla. Give it two to three years to calm down; 88/87.

2001 Kenwood, Cabernet Sauvignon, Artist Series, Sonoma County, California, $70, 2,338 cases. This deep ruby/purple Cab is underscored by black cherries, currants, warm spices and French oak. It is very elegant on the entry, with polished tannins and terrific acidity. The Art Deco styled label features “Femme Bleue a la Guitare.” 88/87.
Find
Reply
03-16-2006, 10:12 PM,
#2
Kcwhippet Offline
Wine Virtuoso
****
Posts: 5,003
Threads: 360
Joined: Jan 1999
 
Never had the Altamura. It and the Kenwood Artists are priced a bit above what I want to spend in my dotage. After all, I don't want to leave a pile of wine larger than many shops (guess who) behind when I go.
Find
Reply
03-16-2006, 10:24 PM,
#3
Bucko Offline
Banned
Posts: 4,800
Threads: 540
Joined: Jan 1999
 
Yeah, these are all samples. The value is not there for me. I can get two really tasty Rhones for the same tariff.
Find
Reply
03-17-2006, 01:33 AM,
#4
brappy Offline
Registered
Posts: 857
Threads: 117
Joined: Nov 2005
 
This may be a little off topic but I've never had the Altamura. I do have two bottles of the '01 downstairs. Do any of you have any notes on the wine. I'm wondering when to open. And if they're worth what I paid (Special deal $30 per).

mark
Find
Reply
03-17-2006, 05:54 AM,
#5
Kcwhippet Offline
Wine Virtuoso
****
Posts: 5,003
Threads: 360
Joined: Jan 1999
 
2001 was generally a good year for just about everyone in CA, so just based on that I'd say you have some decent wines. You got them at less than half what Bucko reports, so you got a good deal. As for ageability, I'm thinking you can open them anytime, but you might be rewarded if you leave them alone for another 5 to 10.
Find
Reply
03-17-2006, 09:42 AM,
#6
Innkeeper Offline
Wine Guru
*****
Posts: 10,465
Threads: 1,106
Joined: Nov 1999
 
If the '01 was made like Bucko describes the '02 ("intense, extracted, jammy"), I'd bet more on five than ten!
Find
Reply
03-17-2006, 06:10 PM,
#7
winoweenie Offline
Wine Guru
*****
Posts: 14,029
Threads: 2,192
Joined: Jun 1999
 
Went back on my tasting notes and found them to be(GASP!!!COUGH!!!GURGGLE!!!) almost identical to the mighty Buck-Snorts. I found a little more black fruits than he reported but didn't like the wine enough to buy for the cellar. Don't have the 01 either. WW
Find
Reply
03-18-2006, 09:56 AM,
#8
brappy Offline
Registered
Posts: 857
Threads: 117
Joined: Nov 2005
 
OK, Thanks, I'll just ignore them for awhile.
Find
Reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Seven heavy hitters from Spring Mountain Bucko 5 10,919 02-13-2006, 01:40 PM
Last Post: Bucko

  • View a Printable Version
  • Send this Thread to a Friend
  • Subscribe to this thread



© 1994-2025 Copyright Wines.com. All rights reserved.