• HOME PAGE
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • YouTube
Current time: 06-15-2025, 02:42 PM Hello There, Guest! (Login — Register)
Wines.com

Translate

  • HOMEHOME
  •   
  • Recent PostsRecent Posts
  •   
  • Search
  •      
  • Archive Lists
  •   
  • Help

WineBoard / RESOURCES AND OTHER STUFF / Wine and Politics v
« Previous 1 … 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next »
/ MI anti-shipping bill passed (@#$^%*!!!!)

Threaded Mode | Linear Mode
MI anti-shipping bill passed (@#$^%*!!!!)
06-09-2000, 10:05 AM,
#1
anna Offline
Registered
Posts: 58
Threads: 26
Joined: Oct 1999
 
No news updates yet -- I just called my state senator's office. The anti-shipping bill passed by a large margin (33 yeas, 4 nays, one excused) after a debate that went until 10:30 last night.

I'm not sure whether this bill has already gone to the state House or not, but things don't look good. I'm just hoping that our governor is a free trade advocate and will veto the bill if it gets past both the House and the Senate. At least there's still that lawsuit in MI too, as a back up!

[This message has been edited by anna (edited 06-09-2000).]
Find
Reply
06-13-2000, 10:59 AM,
#2
Fedup Offline
Registered
Posts: 1
Threads: 0
Joined: Jun 2000
 
Anna -
The MI bill, H4752 (S-1), needs to go back to the House for concurrence since there were significant changes made by the Senate. This did not happen before the midnight deadline on the 8th. There will be a "clean up" session on June 20th. In the meantime Free the Grapes! has asked our MI members to contact the bill's sponsor Nancy Cassis. Cassis original intent was to prevent minors from purchasing wine on the Internet, but of course now the bill does much more than that. Any MI residents who want more information on contacting Cassis can e-mail us at fedup@freethegrapes.org
Seana
Free the Grapes!
Find
Reply
06-13-2000, 11:40 AM,
#3
Thomas Offline
Wine Virtuoso
****
Posts: 6,563
Threads: 231
Joined: Feb 1999
 
The "beauty" of our so-called democratic legislative system is that a bill intended for one purpose rarely stays on focus and often is used by others to address a distinctly separate purpose. In other words, to corrupt the bill.

As I get older I question the system of attaching to and amending bills intended for legislation.
Find
Reply
06-13-2000, 03:46 PM,
#4
mrdutton Offline
Registered
Posts: 1,892
Threads: 145
Joined: Dec 1999
 
That, Foodie, is one reason why I support the line item veto for the President. But that will not happen without an ammendment to the Constitution.
Find
Reply
06-14-2000, 06:10 AM,
#5
Thomas Offline
Wine Virtuoso
****
Posts: 6,563
Threads: 231
Joined: Feb 1999
 
Here's an idea. Give the president not just a line item veto but a line PERSON veto. That way, he can veto the likes of Thurmond, Hatch and all other usurpers of our individual right to make our own decisions, provided of course that the president is not in their camp.
Find
Reply
06-19-2000, 05:37 AM,
#6
Kcwhippet Offline
Wine Virtuoso
****
Posts: 5,003
Threads: 360
Joined: Jan 1999
 
Here's some additional sata - www.winetoday.com/story/0001616.html.
Find
Reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  MA Shipping Bill Glass_A_Day 6 13,509 11-19-2002, 05:28 PM
Last Post: Thomas

  • View a Printable Version
  • Send this Thread to a Friend
  • Subscribe to this thread



© 1994-2025 Copyright Wines.com. All rights reserved.