• HOME PAGE
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • YouTube
Current time: 06-16-2025, 11:46 AM Hello There, Guest! (Login — Register)
Wines.com

Translate

  • HOMEHOME
  •   
  • Recent PostsRecent Posts
  •   
  • Search
  •      
  • Archive Lists
  •   
  • Help

WineBoard / GENERAL / For the Novice v
« Previous 1 … 105 106 107 108 109 … 209 Next »
/ lindemans or rosemount

Threaded Mode | Linear Mode
lindemans or rosemount
01-23-2003, 11:35 PM,
#1
leosc Offline
Registered
Posts: 12
Threads: 6
Joined: Dec 2002
 
Which wine is better for Shiraz - Lindemans or Rosemount? Are they on the same category?

Also, is Beringer a good choice for a Merlot?
Find
Reply
01-24-2003, 09:01 AM,
#2
Innkeeper Offline
Wine Guru
*****
Posts: 10,465
Threads: 1,106
Joined: Nov 1999
 
They both have many different brands at different price points. It would be very difficult to compare them at all levels. They are very close in quality.

The Beringer Founders Estate is a fairly good merlot, but I much prefer the cabernet sauvignon.
Find
Reply
01-24-2003, 09:35 AM,
#3
leosc Offline
Registered
Posts: 12
Threads: 6
Joined: Dec 2002
 
Thanks IK. I bought a 2001 rosemount diamond shiraz ($11) as I have read some very good review on it. The Lindeman's are cheaper than rosemount but as you have said, they have a lot of brands at different price points.

Also, the wine salesman recommended a Michel Lynch Bordeaux Merlot 1998 for $13. He claims that it is a good Merlot.
Find
Reply
01-24-2003, 01:49 PM,
#4
debprobert Offline
Registered
Posts: 2
Threads: 1
Joined: Jan 2003
 
I was introduced to Shiraz while in Australia and fell in love (with the wine.) I found (here in CA) the most comparable is the CA SYRAH (or Petite Syrah.) It is virtually the same grape and I like Fess Parker's Syrah and BOGLE's. Hope you like them!
Find
Reply
01-24-2003, 03:23 PM,
#5
Auburnwine Offline
Registered
Posts: 369
Threads: 67
Joined: Jun 2002
 
Does Bogle make a syrah? Their petit syrah (a different grape) is quite good.

The Australian topic has some comments on wonderful, inexpensive shirazes. Some perceive that the Rosemount diamond label has declined in recent years, or maybe it's just that the better competition is more widely available.
Find
Reply
01-24-2003, 08:22 PM,
#6
Drew Offline
Wine Whiz
***
Posts: 4,387
Threads: 1,025
Joined: Dec 1999
 
I think the Diamond series has gently rolled down hill since the '96 vintage and that's taking into consideration the good '98 vintage. I haven't tried the '01 yet but spotted some on the shelves the other day and will try. '01 is looking to be a great vintage for Aussie wines.

DRew

[This message has been edited by Drew (edited 01-24-2003).]
Find
Reply
01-25-2003, 11:33 AM,
#7
stevebody Offline
Registered
Posts: 455
Threads: 72
Joined: Jan 2003
 
My buddy who sells Lindemans to us here in Seattle has pushed this stuff at me for years, so I finally revisited the line last week. IMHO, even with Rosemount's undeniable "gentle decline" they are still LIGHT YEARS ahead of Lindy's in their basic-wine category. Both make some beautiful upper-tier wines but the Lindy's Shiraz I had last week was INSIPID. I actually called my pal and asked him to replace the bottle with virtually anything else, the first time I've EVER done that. It was just everything an Aussie, fruit-bome, smack yo' mama Sheeraz should NOT be.
Find
Reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »


  • View a Printable Version
  • Send this Thread to a Friend
  • Subscribe to this thread



© 1994-2025 Copyright Wines.com. All rights reserved.