• HOME PAGE
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • YouTube
Current time: 06-14-2025, 07:48 AM Hello There, Guest! (Login — Register)
Wines.com

Translate

  • HOMEHOME
  •   
  • Recent PostsRecent Posts
  •   
  • Search
  •      
  • Archive Lists
  •   
  • Help

WineBoard / TASTING NOTES & WINE SPECIFIC FORUMS / Northwest Wines v
« Previous 1 … 5 6 7 8 9 … 13 Next »
/ Wine Spectator reviews Oregon Pinot Noir (and others)

Threaded Mode | Linear Mode
Wine Spectator reviews Oregon Pinot Noir (and others)
06-04-2004, 03:46 PM,
#1
wondersofwine Offline
Registered
Posts: 5,585
Threads: 1,179
Joined: May 2001
 
I have to agree with some of WS choices on this one. They liked Ponzi, Torii Mor and Argyle, all of which I like and St. Innocent which Bucko likes. (The first St. Innocent Pinot I tried was too young but I've since tasted another one that I thought was quite well made.) I highlighted a bunch more to look for that I haven't tried yet (keep hearing recommendations for wines of Patricia Green). WS also liked Ponzi Pinot Gris but that's not a varietal I really like. I prefered their Pinot Blanc which isn't rated in the WS issue. Interesting article on Carlton Studio also. Eric Hamacher was one of the forces behind this shared winery facility and he is married to Luisa Ponzi, daughter of Nancy and Dick Ponzi. All winemakers.
I met Nancy and Dick Ponzi at the Triangle Wine Fest in 2003.

[This message has been edited by wondersofwine (edited 06-04-2004).]
Find
Reply
06-04-2004, 04:04 PM,
#2
dananne Offline
Registered
Posts: 1,938
Threads: 474
Joined: Jan 2002
 
I was pretty interested in that article, too. I can't wait to start diving into some of the Oregon stuff I've picked up of late: Lemelson, Ken Wright, Carabella, Hamacher, A to Z, Sineann, Bethel Heights. I'm starting to see some of the higher-end and/or smaller producers coming into the Atlanta market over the past year or so. I remember not too long ago when I wanted an Oregon Pinot around here, all I had to choose from was King Estate and Erath. I'm really not exaggerating.

Hmmm, this Oregon Pinot talk has gotten me to thinking about what to open tonight . . .
Find
Reply
06-06-2004, 08:30 PM,
#3
Bucko Offline
Banned
Posts: 4,800
Threads: 540
Joined: Jan 1999
 
$75, $50, $85, $150, $75, $60, $50.......

Those are the prices of the top seven wines that the Spec rated -- ridiculous to me. None of the wines are even in a style that I can drink.

The Spec and WA have lost it, or at least lost me. Listen to the descriptors of some of the top Pinots, a delicate, feminine grape mind you:

Big, ripe, powerful, rich, seductive, generous berries, strong tannins, a blast of juicy blackberry -- is anyone else sick to death of these over-extracted abortions?

SCREAM!!!!!!! There, I feel much better now.
Find
Reply
06-07-2004, 06:12 AM,
#4
Kcwhippet Offline
Wine Virtuoso
****
Posts: 5,003
Threads: 360
Joined: Jan 1999
 
What about Willakenzie? WS usually scores them fairly high. We stopped in there back in 2001, and a friend we were with mentioned to the guy in the tasting room that he and Judy worked with a Bernie LaCroute, the owner, back on the east coast a few years before. The tasting room guy gave a call to the house and it turns out it's the same person. Bernie came out to the winery, they reminisced, we tasted from barrel, etc., etc., so now we get a few bottles sent out this way every so often.
Find
Reply
06-07-2004, 07:59 AM,
#5
wondersofwine Offline
Registered
Posts: 5,585
Threads: 1,179
Joined: May 2001
 
I think a couple Willakenzie wines got respectable scores. I'll check when I have a chance and let you know KC.
Find
Reply
06-07-2004, 12:56 PM,
#6
dananne Offline
Registered
Posts: 1,938
Threads: 474
Joined: Jan 2002
 
I agree with Bucko, to a point. Those prices are nuts.

I, too, like the more feminine versions, and some can still be found in Oregon, though the tendency, admittedly, is still the masculine, tannic, extracted power.

I'll post on two Oregon wines I had this weekend later -- a 99 Lemelson and a 00 Benton Lane.
Find
Reply
06-07-2004, 06:19 PM,
#7
Thomas Offline
Wine Virtuoso
****
Posts: 6,563
Threads: 231
Joined: Feb 1999
 
Oh Bucko--you is speakin' truth!

What the mags have done is succumb to the notion that the rest of us low-life, no money losers aren't interested in real wine--the money is at the top and so more and more they cover the real wines--read as, top money wines.
Find
Reply
06-07-2004, 07:38 PM,
#8
chittychattykathy Offline
Registered
Posts: 729
Threads: 44
Joined: Dec 1999
 
When first getting into wine I almost only bought Oregon P.N., in fact, one year I toured the valley at least four times. Loved them.
Now days...
Well, I can't remember the last time I "paid" for ORE P.N.-- although I have consumed and really, really enjoyed many.
If I'm buyin' it's Cali or French first,
ORE has outpriced themselves in my mind.
Find
Reply
06-07-2004, 07:47 PM,
#9
Bucko Offline
Banned
Posts: 4,800
Threads: 540
Joined: Jan 1999
 
Sad isn't it. Many delightful sub-$20 wines never get any press. Surely they can't be good because they don't cost fifty bucks.... what a scam.
Find
Reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  2007 Archery Summit Renegade Ridge Estate Pinot Noir, Dundee Hills, Oregon wondersofwine 0 13,628 05-12-2011, 09:36 PM
Last Post: wondersofwine
  2009 O'Reilly Pinot Noir, Oregon wondersofwine 2 18,198 08-06-2010, 02:12 PM
Last Post: TheEngineer
  2002 and 2004 Thomas Pinot Noir, Oregon wondersofwine 1 15,706 09-22-2008, 01:38 PM
Last Post: dananne
  Oregon Pinot Noir under $20 reviewed wondersofwine 3 16,975 05-11-2006, 09:56 AM
Last Post: wondersofwine
  2000 Adelsheim Oregon Pinot Noir dananne 4 16,684 05-27-2003, 04:22 PM
Last Post: dananne
  1996 Hamacher Pinot Noir, Oregon Bucko 0 7,937 01-26-1999, 12:15 AM
Last Post: Bucko

  • View a Printable Version
  • Send this Thread to a Friend
  • Subscribe to this thread



© 1994-2025 Copyright Wines.com. All rights reserved.