• HOME PAGE
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • YouTube
Current time: 06-15-2025, 01:56 PM Hello There, Guest! (Login — Register)
Wines.com

Translate

  • HOMEHOME
  •   
  • Recent PostsRecent Posts
  •   
  • Search
  •      
  • Archive Lists
  •   
  • Help

WineBoard / RESOURCES AND OTHER STUFF / Best Buys/Steal Deals v
« Previous 1 … 15 16 17 18 19 Next »
/ To All You Aussies out there!

Threaded Mode | Linear Mode
To All You Aussies out there!
06-16-2000, 12:30 PM,
#1
pergamum Offline
Registered
Posts: 40
Threads: 15
Joined: May 2000
 
Banrock Station 1999, one of Wine Spectator's "Best Buys" for this month is excellent! This Shiraz-Cab combination actually has a moderate degree of complexity for its price $10 or less. Upon first confronted the wine, one cannot ignore the bouquet of rubber mixed with raspberries and "burnt toast?". A smooth raspberry palate with a spicy, herbal finish. Wonderful! I recommend it to all you penny pinching Aussie lovers out there (like myself). [img]http://www.wines.com/ubb2/tongue.gif[/img]
Find
Reply
06-16-2000, 03:31 PM,
#2
Catch 22 Offline
Registered
Posts: 114
Threads: 21
Joined: Aug 1999
 
I have spoken highly of this wine here in the past, but I didn't think the '99 was quite as good as years past. Now Wine Spectator is extolling it's virtues. Great, they'll raise the price. Oh, well. If anyone else tries this wine, I suggest a little longer than normal "breathing" time. For some reason, this wine is often better the next day if not finished right away.
Find
Reply
06-16-2000, 04:29 PM,
#3
pergamum Offline
Registered
Posts: 40
Threads: 15
Joined: May 2000
 
Well, that works for me! I purchased a magnum for $10.00 yesterday. Just curious, what does letting Banrock breath do for the wine? And, what years do you think are its best? I might have mistakenly bought a 98 when I had originally intended to by a 99.
Find
Reply
06-16-2000, 05:46 PM,
#4
Catch 22 Offline
Registered
Posts: 114
Threads: 21
Joined: Aug 1999
 
Consider yourself lucky if you got the 98. The 99 is ok, but I really liked both the 97 and 98. I haven't had any earlier vintages. I'm not very good at the descriptive aspect of wine, but it just seems a little smoother or mellower with some breathing, losing the slight harsh edge it has upon opening. For $6, it works for me, even the 99.
Find
Reply
06-16-2000, 07:25 PM,
#5
Innkeeper Offline
Wine Guru
*****
Posts: 10,465
Threads: 1,106
Joined: Nov 1999
 
The Aussies have certainly got the word about American's hunger for liquid toothpicks. The main reason I didn't go ballistic about the Rosemount Chardonnay posted below, that mother made be buy for the napkin rings, was that it reeked with oak.
Find
Reply
06-16-2000, 07:49 PM,
#6
pergamum Offline
Registered
Posts: 40
Threads: 15
Joined: May 2000
 
Point well taken Innkeeper. I'm a bit of an oak junky, however, only in the right amounts. Furthermore, the affordable cost of the aforementioned wine makes it doubtful that oak was used at all (oak does cost you). However, admittedly, a try to stay clear of the wines that don't read, but should "Oak flavor added"--it puts wine on par with concentrated fruit juice. [img]http://www.wines.com/ubb2/tongue.gif[/img]
Find
Reply
06-16-2000, 11:01 PM,
#7
chittychattykathy Offline
Registered
Posts: 729
Threads: 44
Joined: Dec 1999
 
The Lennards Crossing Shiraz is quite nice as well, and for $6.50-$7.00ish works great for those times when you need several bottles of something good to serve a larger group.
Find
Reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »


  • View a Printable Version
  • Send this Thread to a Friend
  • Subscribe to this thread



© 1994-2025 Copyright Wines.com. All rights reserved.