• HOME PAGE
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • YouTube
Current time: 06-15-2025, 09:33 PM Hello There, Guest! (Login — Register)
Wines.com

Translate

  • HOMEHOME
  •   
  • Recent PostsRecent Posts
  •   
  • Search
  •      
  • Archive Lists
  •   
  • Help

WineBoard / TASTING NOTES & WINE SPECIFIC FORUMS / Champagne/Sparkling Wine v
« Previous 1 … 13 14 15 16 17 Next »
/ Korbel Cellars, Millennium Commemorative Cuvee

Threaded Mode | Linear Mode
Korbel Cellars, Millennium Commemorative Cuvee
08-31-1999, 02:44 PM,
#10
tomstevenson Offline
Registered
Posts: 216
Threads: 13
Joined: Jan 1999
 
I have been accused of being diplomatically generous in awarding Korbel 68 points in my Christie's World Encyclopedia of Champagne & Sparkling Wine and I have a certain sympathy with my critics on this one. However, I agree with Curmy about the Korbel Rouge (which is indeed a blend of Pinot Noir and Cabernet Sauvignon) being the best of the bunch. In fact, when I visited Korbel in April, I suggested they enter it in the International Wine Challenge at London. To be frank, Korbel would not be expected to win any commendations, let alone medals, in UK competitions, but the IWC gets an increasing number of red Australian fizz, most of which is of this sweetness level and it would be interesting to see how Korbel Rouge performs under blind conditions amongst these wines, which have a great cult following.

The Commemorative Cuvee (70% Chardonnay, 25% Pinot Noir, 5% Meunier from 1995 & 1996) is not bad, with more pineapple and melon when I tasted it. The Grand Brut and Brut Rose are both acceptable, but the 1993 Le Premier ranks as one of the worst sparkling wines I have ever tasted. I could not get it past my nose: my body refused it entry!

As for Foodie's story about Millennium being trademarked, somebody called Dave West claims to have registered Millennium with the CIVC (Champagne authorities), but after a number of Champagnes using the term appeared on a variety of drinks on UK shelves, one of the large spirit firm claimed to have registered it as a trademark, but in an announcement published by Harper's Wine & Spirit Gazette this firm magnanimously allowed others to use it free of charge. I have not investigated either claim, but there is now so much stuff about that I doubt anything could be done (either that or the "sneaky" bastard is waiting to rake it in after the Millennium celebrations).
Find
Reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »


Messages In This Thread
[No subject] - by - 08-24-1999, 08:12 PM
[No subject] - by - 08-25-1999, 02:53 AM
[No subject] - by - 08-25-1999, 07:27 AM
[No subject] - by - 08-26-1999, 10:39 PM
[No subject] - by - 08-27-1999, 02:49 AM
[No subject] - by - 08-28-1999, 03:42 AM
[No subject] - by - 08-28-1999, 06:53 AM
[No subject] - by - 08-28-1999, 04:49 PM
[No subject] - by - 08-31-1999, 02:43 PM
[No subject] - by - 08-31-1999, 02:44 PM
[No subject] - by - 09-10-1999, 04:24 AM
[No subject] - by - 09-10-1999, 07:26 AM
[No subject] - by - 09-11-1999, 05:22 AM

  • View a Printable Version
  • Send this Thread to a Friend
  • Subscribe to this thread



© 1994-2025 Copyright Wines.com. All rights reserved.