• HOME PAGE
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • YouTube
Current time: 06-15-2025, 09:08 PM Hello There, Guest! (Login — Register)
Wines.com

Translate

  • HOMEHOME
  •   
  • Recent PostsRecent Posts
  •   
  • Search
  •      
  • Archive Lists
  •   
  • Help

WineBoard / TASTING NOTES & WINE SPECIFIC FORUMS / Champagne/Sparkling Wine v
« Previous 1 … 4 5 6 7 8 … 17 Next »
/ Pol Roger Tasting

Threaded Mode | Linear Mode
Pol Roger Tasting
04-22-2008, 10:21 AM,
#1
Skeeter Offline
Registered
Posts: 153
Threads: 64
Joined: Jun 2003
 
First off: Christian Pol-Roger may describe himself as a “bad actor”, but I could listen to him talk all day. Witty, charming and very well-spoken, he didn’t seem to draw breath for ninety minutes with his encyclopaedic wine knowledge, his family anecdotes and his numerous stories about Pol Roger devotee, Sir Winston Churchill. But on with the wine.

Pol Roger Brut NV: We started with the non-vintage, of course, and it’s as good as it ever was. Lemony, crisp with excellent length and elegance. Tiny, persistent mousse, apparently due to the natural refrigeration qualities of the Pol-Roger catacombs. According to C p-R, it’s an excellent aperitif and a match to seafood and cheeses. Big Tick, of course. In fact, just assume a Big Tick unless I say other wise.

1999 Pol Roger Blanc de Blancs: Drier and toastier than the NV, really filling the nose. Complex and long, with an excellent yeasty follow-through on the back palate. Great stuff.

1999 Pol Roger Rose: Light salmon colour… and I was pleased to her C P-R use that term AFTER I’d written it down in my notes. I’m getting better at this! Beautiful strawberry/raspberry/light cherry flavours. Dry, long, great depth. Quite a Big Tick for this one.

1998 Pol Roger Mellower nose than the ’99, but probably the highlight of my day. Fresh bread, toasty highlights, massively complex and full. Just stunning. The first-ever recipient of a Big Tick o’ Approval Plus. Yep, so good I had to invent a new designation. Impressive.

1998 Pol Roger Sir Winston Churchill: A bonus wine, and what a bonus it was. Still youthful, but well-rounded, mouthfilling and deep. Subtle citrus notes, obviously still unfolding. C P-R talked of its long aging potential. I’d have to agree. Too bad I can’t afford it.

Pol Roger Cuvee Rich NV: A demi-sec Champagne, with subtle sweetness (34g/l) and rich flavours. Less citric than it’s brut brothers it was a much different beast, but still very good. I’d personally stick to the dry NV, though.


All in all, there's worse ways to spend an afternoon. [img]http://wines.com/ubb/smile.gif[/img]
Find
Reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »


Messages In This Thread
[No subject] - by - 04-22-2008, 10:21 AM
[No subject] - by - 04-22-2008, 10:28 AM
[No subject] - by - 04-23-2008, 12:25 AM
[No subject] - by - 05-08-2008, 08:34 AM

  • View a Printable Version
  • Send this Thread to a Friend
  • Subscribe to this thread



© 1994-2025 Copyright Wines.com. All rights reserved.