• HOME PAGE
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • YouTube
Current time: 06-16-2025, 07:18 AM Hello There, Guest! (Login — Register)
Wines.com

Translate

  • HOMEHOME
  •   
  • Recent PostsRecent Posts
  •   
  • Search
  •      
  • Archive Lists
  •   
  • Help

WineBoard / TASTING NOTES & WINE SPECIFIC FORUMS / Pinot Noir/Red Burgundy v
« Previous 1 … 42 43 44 45 46 … 54 Next »
/ Revised (upward) opinion

Threaded Mode | Linear Mode
Revised (upward) opinion
10-09-2003, 04:46 PM,
#1
wondersofwine Offline
Registered
Posts: 5,585
Threads: 1,179
Joined: May 2001
 
I commented earlier that the 2000 Steele Carneros Pinot Noir did not equal the 1999 vintage. Tasting the 2000 with Jed Steele just a few months ago in Raleigh I found it to be somewhat disappointing. He himself said it was a lighter wine than the 1999.
On a recent trip to Florida I was put in charge of choosing the wine for a family dinner at a restaurant and saw Steele Pinot Noir on the menu with no vintage listed. I asked the vintage and was told 2001. I went ahead and ordered it but it turned out to be the 2000 vintage. However it was not the light, almost watery wine I sampled in Raleigh. This was, as the server assured us, a beautiful wine--medium-bodied with enchanting bouquet and flavor. I don't know if this was bottle variation or if the wine just needed a few months to get past an awkward stage. I think I have one bottle of the 2000 at home and will now be eager to try it.
Find
Reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »


Messages In This Thread
[No subject] - by - 10-09-2003, 04:46 PM

  • View a Printable Version
  • Send this Thread to a Friend
  • Subscribe to this thread



© 1994-2025 Copyright Wines.com. All rights reserved.