• HOME PAGE
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • YouTube
Current time: 06-15-2025, 10:36 PM Hello There, Guest! (Login — Register)
Wines.com

Translate

  • HOMEHOME
  •   
  • Recent PostsRecent Posts
  •   
  • Search
  •      
  • Archive Lists
  •   
  • Help

WineBoard / RESOURCES AND OTHER STUFF / Wine and Politics v
« Previous 1 … 5 6 7 8 9
/ NOW MARYLAND

Threaded Mode | Linear Mode
NOW MARYLAND
02-05-1999, 05:36 PM,
#7
amshih Offline
Registered
Posts: 45
Threads: 11
Joined: Jan 1999
 
I find it interesting that the mainline wine industry groups opposed CFT for being aggressive. I find it puzzling...WC, any more insights on why this was so?

I'm currently doing free legal research for CFT (thanks WC for making the contact for me!); CFT shifted from legislative fights to courtroom fights primarily because it appeared legislative fights weren't working. WSWA has many allies and minions to do their bidding; it seems harder to organize angry consumers to help the cause. I think that FTG!, while nice, is simply not enough to mobilize consumers. Besides, there don't seem to be enough wine consumers anyway -- that, we need to increase too.

I apologize for my rambling, by the way.
Find
Reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »


Messages In This Thread
[No subject] - by - 02-04-1999, 08:54 AM
[No subject] - by - 02-04-1999, 11:52 AM
[No subject] - by - 02-04-1999, 01:33 PM
[No subject] - by - 02-04-1999, 03:40 PM
[No subject] - by - 02-04-1999, 08:34 PM
[No subject] - by - 02-05-1999, 03:25 PM
[No subject] - by - 02-05-1999, 05:36 PM
[No subject] - by - 02-06-1999, 02:25 AM

  • View a Printable Version
  • Send this Thread to a Friend
  • Subscribe to this thread



© 1994-2025 Copyright Wines.com. All rights reserved.