• HOME PAGE
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • YouTube
Current time: 06-15-2025, 10:53 PM Hello There, Guest! (Login — Register)
Wines.com

Translate

  • HOMEHOME
  •   
  • Recent PostsRecent Posts
  •   
  • Search
  •      
  • Archive Lists
  •   
  • Help

WineBoard / RESOURCES AND OTHER STUFF / Wine and Politics v
1 2 3 4 5 … 9 Next »
/ I see no threads, too many wines perhaps?

Threaded Mode | Linear Mode
I see no threads, too many wines perhaps?
02-13-2006, 08:14 PM,
#6
Thomas Offline
Wine Virtuoso
****
Posts: 6,563
Threads: 231
Joined: Feb 1999
 
Engineer,

At the risk of this becoming too lengthy, the Supreme Court has over the decades consistently decided to allow the states leeway because, as justice Kennedy even said when the court issued the shipping ruling, alcohol is a special product that does not deserve the same constitutional protections as other products--even guns.

The wholesalers know full well how much power that gives them. Their latest move is designed to weaken the Supreme Court's decision to leave it standing but ineffective, because nothing in that decision precludes states from banning all shipping--it only forces states to treat all wineries throughout the country alike.



[This message has been edited by foodie (edited 02-13-2006).]
Find
Reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »


Messages In This Thread
[No subject] - by - 02-12-2006, 05:51 PM
[No subject] - by - 02-12-2006, 06:30 PM
[No subject] - by - 02-12-2006, 08:27 PM
[No subject] - by - 02-12-2006, 08:34 PM
[No subject] - by - 02-13-2006, 06:30 PM
[No subject] - by - 02-13-2006, 08:14 PM
[No subject] - by - 02-14-2006, 02:06 AM
[No subject] - by - 02-14-2006, 06:15 AM
[No subject] - by - 02-14-2006, 07:49 AM
[No subject] - by - 02-14-2006, 08:31 AM
[No subject] - by - 02-14-2006, 01:54 PM
[No subject] - by - 02-15-2006, 01:53 AM

  • View a Printable Version
  • Send this Thread to a Friend
  • Subscribe to this thread



© 1994-2025 Copyright Wines.com. All rights reserved.