WineBoard
Winner from CA - Printable Version

+- WineBoard (https://www.wines.com/wineboard)
+-- Forum: TASTING NOTES & WINE SPECIFIC FORUMS (https://www.wines.com/wineboard/forum-200.html)
+--- Forum: Rhone/South of France/Wines/Varieties (https://www.wines.com/wineboard/forum-31.html)
+--- Thread: Winner from CA (/thread-11688.html)



- Bucko - 09-23-2001

1999 Martella, Hammer Syrah, California, $23, 633 cases. Full-bodied, lush, with smooth tannins, this dark ruby beauty offers lovely blackberries, plums and vanilla to please the senses. 90/91.


- ddf68 - 09-25-2001

Martella? Hammer? Is this winemaker a descendant of the Merovingian kings of France?

ddf


- Bucko - 09-25-2001

Who?


- zenda2 - 09-25-2001

Pretty amusing, dd.

Bucko, here's some info on Charles Martell, the 'Hammer' and the battle of Tours. Good excuse to go out and rent 'El Cid' tonight.

---------------
October 10, 732 AD marks the conclusion of the Battle of Tours, arguably one of the most decisive battles in all of history.

A Moslem army, in a crusading search for land and the end of Christianity, after the conquest of Syria, Egypt, and North Africa, began to invade Western Europe under the leadership of Abd-er Rahman, governor of Spain. Abd-er Rahman led an infantry of 60,000 to 400,000 soldiers across the Western Pyrenees and toward the Loire River, but they were met just outside the city of Tours by Charles Martel, known as the Hammer, and the Frankish Army.

Martel gathered his forces directly in the path of the oncoming Moslem army and prepared to defend themselves by using a phalanx style of combat. The invading Moslems rushed forward, relying on the slashing tactics and overwhelming number of horsemen that had brought them victories in the past. However, the French Army, composed of foot soldiers armed only with swords, shields, axes, javelins, and daggers, was well trained. Despite the effectiveness of the Moslem army in previous battles, the terrain caused them a disadvantage. Their strength lied within their cavalry, armed with large swords and lances, which along with their baggage mules, limited their mobility. The French army displayed great ardency in withstanding the ferocious attack. It was one of the rare times in the Middle Ages when infantry held its ground against a mounted attack. The exact length of the battle is undetermined; Arab sources claim that it was a two day battle whereas Christian sources hold that the fighting clamored on for seven days. In either case, the battle ended when the French captured and killed Abd-er Rahman. The Moslem army withdrew peacefully overnight and even though Martel expected a surprise retaliation, there was none. For the Moslems, the death of their leader caused a sharp setback and they had no choice but to retreat back across the Pyrenees, never to return again.

Not only did this prove to be an extremely decisive battle for the Christians, but the Battle of Tours is considered the high water mark of the Moslem invasion of Western Europe.

-----------------------------------


- Bucko - 09-25-2001

I'm afraid that one was lost on me. I never liked that era of history and it obviously shows......


- winoweenie - 09-25-2001

I always hate it when I have to fight a guy on horsie-back and i'm afoot. WW


- hotwine - 09-25-2001

Nay, nay, WW. The key is to force him to dismount, and get him all balled up in the process, and close with him as infantry.

hotwine, formerly an Lt of mounted infantry


- barnesy - 09-26-2001

I've always found that long spears tend to neutralize cavalry pretty well....nasty on the horse meat...but if you're french..its win win.

Also, Charles Martel be the grand pappy of Chucky the Great...Carolus Magnus...Charlemagne.

This is the tail end of the history I do...

Barnesy

[This message has been edited by barnesy (edited 09-26-2001).]